Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

using Ring instead of BoringSSL #16

Closed
VMatrix1900 opened this issue Feb 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

using Ring instead of BoringSSL #16

VMatrix1900 opened this issue Feb 3, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@VMatrix1900
Copy link
Contributor

VMatrix1900 commented Feb 3, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Can the Ring library handle the TLS handshake process so we can get rid of BoringSSL?
@ghedo
Copy link
Member

ghedo commented Feb 4, 2019

ring doesn't implement TLS, so no, that is not possible. In any case BoringSSL is an explicit design decision and we don't intend to get rid of it at this point.

@ghedo ghedo closed this as completed Feb 4, 2019
@cretz cretz mentioned this issue Jan 5, 2020
Open
@psionic12 psionic12 mentioned this issue Mar 23, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ghedo @VMatrix1900