You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, the numbers you report here differ from the paper.
Is the version of the paper using the heatmaps? If yes, do you have numbers without heatmaps? They would help a lot.
Are these new numbers using the same experimental framework reported in the paper? Batch size, number of iterations, etc.?
I also found that some of the architectures do not match with the ones reported in the paper. For instance, the discriminator max_dim goes up to 512 (in the paper says 1024), and the mapping network is different as well. Is there going to be an updated arxiv version?
[EDIT]. If AFHQ does not use heatmaps, why the numbers are also different from the paper?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, the numbers you report here differ from the paper.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: