You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are a few handicaps with the class-based ntuple:
cannot analyse ntuples without CMSSW/compiling and loading classes
whenever the classes change, older ntuples cannot be read anymore
I would like to change the ntuple such that it contains only flat branches (and vectors, we probably need vector<vector>). This would mean that everyone needs to change their analysis scripts, but I hope it's not too much work.
Let me know what you think by replying here. We'll probably introduce a branch in parallel to master so that people can have a look before changing the default if people agree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are a few handicaps with the class-based ntuple:
I would like to change the ntuple such that it contains only flat branches (and vectors, we probably need vector<vector>). This would mean that everyone needs to change their analysis scripts, but I hope it's not too much work.
Let me know what you think by replying here. We'll probably introduce a branch in parallel to master so that people can have a look before changing the default if people agree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: