-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Random PR test comparison failures in DD4Hep workflows #33552
Comments
assign geometry |
New categories assigned: geometry @Dr15Jones,@cvuosalo,@civanch,@ianna,@mdhildreth,@makortel you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
A new Issue was created by @makortel Matti Kortelainen. @Dr15Jones, @dpiparo, @silviodonato, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
One occurrence is here #33526 (comment) |
Another one #33534 (comment) |
Here is another #33549 (comment) |
is there a way to track which machine was used in each case? |
Did anybody run valgrind on those DD4HEP wf? |
I asked last week on two PRs for externals the same thing |
Here is another #33550 (comment) |
This workflow was stable for the last few weeks, but now it is unstable again. I think some recent change either re-activated an old bug or introduced a new stability problem. I will submit a PR to remove it from the PR tests for now. |
Looking through the recent history of merged PRs, I think the recent ROOT update might be a suspect for triggering the instability: cms-sw/cmsdist#6835 ROOT change (April 23) That said, the instability seems to be around the 10% level. Many PR tests pass successfully with this workflow. |
@VinInn > Did anybody run valgrind on those DD4HEP wf? Yes, I ran it back on March 5: #32963 (comment) |
PR #33568 submitted to remove the DD4hep workflow from the PR tests. |
+1 |
This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed. |
The 11634.911 DD4hep workflow is now stable. See #34003. This issue can be closed. |
We are seeing infrequent comparison failures in DD4Hep workflows in tests of unrelated PRs. The purpose of this issue is to track their frequency and progress to find out the cause.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: