New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pr90x l1t prescales from payloads #17721
Pr90x l1t prescales from payloads #17721
Conversation
…module after the change in L1TGlobalUtils.
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/SiStripMonitorClient @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
…riggerProducer configuration file.
Pull request #17721 was updated. @perrotta, @monttj, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @slava77, @vanbesien, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
The above commit does not fix it all the way, but the configuration parameter is needed. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 1cc365e You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: AddOn
I found errors in the following addon tests: cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc6_amd64_gcc530/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_9_1_X_2017-03-25-1100/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_PRef.py realData=True globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Sun Mar 26 15:33:22 2017-date Sun Mar 26 15:27:32 2017 s - exit: 16640 |
Comparison job queued. |
Pull request #17721 was updated. @perrotta, @monttj, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @slava77, @vanbesien, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
As discussed in the ORP meeting, the test comparison histograms are often a red herring, |
Reverted to configuration with a default setup that uses GT for prescales. |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@davidlange6 We would like this for 9_1_0_pre3, if possible. |
+1
|
Hi @rekovic - please fix the merge conflict. Thanks |
@davidlange6 Done with #18428. Started tests and L1T signed. |
Since you opened a second pull request, please close this one. Ideally, it would be for the best if you just reused this PR. :) |
90x PR: Updated L1TGlobalUtil to now also access L1T prescales from payloads, using GlobalTag.
Example:
Automatically ported from CMSSW_9_0_X #17512 (original by @cms-l1t-offline).
Please wait for a new IB (12 to 24H) before requesting to test this PR.