New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various improvements to CSC local trigger emulator #25165
Various improvements to CSC local trigger emulator #25165
Conversation
small changes to CSCTriggerPrimitivesReader
2. optimized the cancellation logic 3. optimized the ALCT search part
change the configuration for clctSLHC to make it consistent with the ones for data-taking
2. move the dead time of Cathodeprocessor from trigger level to pretrigger level
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25165/7165 Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying a patch in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25165/7165/git-diff.patch You can run |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25165/7166 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Comparison looks good. For one WF (20034.0) the CSC DQM comparison failed in one plot, namely for |
@fabiocos Do you have any comments on this PR? |
@dildick in the description you mention improvement of the data/emulator agreement, but in the limited statistics of tests of the PR nothing is seen in DQM. Is this due to the small number of events, or what else? |
@fabiocos The improvements that we made in the trigger emulator are of the order 0.5% to 1.5%. You probably won't see them in the DQM. @tahuang1991 |
+1 |
This PR is the last one in a series to improve the CSC local trigger emulator. Follow up of #24422. It is based on the results of 2018 pp collision data vs emulator studies. The studies were carried out during the Summer and Fall of 2018. The proposed changes improve the agreement between the CSC DAQ data and the emulator in CMSSW.
Supporting material with plots can be found in the slides below:
List of all changes:
CSCBaseboard:
ALCT processor:
To make emulator in ALCT part consistent with firmware, the change is to allow re-triggering on same wiregroup in 6BX after the earlier ALCT on the wiregroup.
CLCT processor:
Trigger motherboard:
CSCTriggerPrimitivesReader
@tahuang1991 @ptcox @lpernie