Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-20.1: sql: prevent time-related precision during upgrade from 19.2 -> 20.1 #47438

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2020

Conversation

otan
Copy link
Contributor

@otan otan commented Apr 13, 2020

Backport 1/1 commits from #47425.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


The intention is to backport this if we think this change is important.

Release note (sql change): We previously allowed mixed type 20.1/19.2
upgrades to add time precision. However, the 19.2 would disrespect the
precision component and we documented that. To make this cleaner, we
instead only allow precision to be specified in time-related types when
the version upgrade is complete.

The intention is to backport this if we think this change is important.

Release note (sql change): We previously allowed mixed type 20.1/19.2
upgrades to add time precision. However, the 19.2 would disrespect the
precision component and we documented that. To make this cleaner, we
instead only allow precision to be specified in time-related types when
the version upgrade is complete.
@otan otan requested a review from rohany April 13, 2020 17:36
@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Apr 13, 2020

Welcome back, creator. Thank you for testing me.

My owl senses detect your PR is good for review. Please keep an eye out for any test failures in CI.

🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is otan.

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@otan otan merged commit ba27359 into cockroachdb:release-20.1 Apr 13, 2020
@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member

Should we check off one of the boxes in release blockers issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants