Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kvserver: observe lease transfer interval in considerRebalance #54322

Conversation

ajwerner
Copy link
Contributor

This commit plumbs the lease transfer rate limit into the lease transfer which
occurs as a part of rebalancing decision making. The decision about whether a
node should remove itself for the purpose of rebalancing happens at a much
higher rate than the the actual rebalancing. This can lead to massive
oscillations of leaseholders as the calculation on which replica should be
removed in the face of node addition changes dramatically. We utilize
a rate limit in lease transfer decisions to smooth this decision making
elsewhere. This limit however is not utilized currently when deciding to
transfer a lease for the purpose of rebalancing data. This change has
shown very positive impact mitigating these lease transfer storms. See
the commentary on #51867.

Release note (bug fix): Made lease transfers during rebalancing adhere
to the rate limit utilized in other lease transfer cases which eliminates
unexpected lease oscillations when adding a new node.

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

This commit plumbs the lease transfer rate limit into the lease transfer which
occurs as a part of rebalancing decision making. The decision about whether a
node should remove itself for the purpose of rebalancing happens at a much
higher rate than the the actual rebalancing. This can lead to massive
oscillations of leaseholders as the calculation on which replica should be
removed in the face of node addition changes dramatically. We utilize
a rate limit in lease transfer decisions to smooth this decision making
elsewhere. This limit however is not utilized currently when deciding to
transfer a lease for the purpose of rebalancing data. This change has
shown very positive impact mitigating these lease transfer storms. See
the commentary on cockroachdb#51867.

Release note (bug fix): Made lease transfers during rebalancing adhere
to the rate limit utilized in other lease transfer cases which eliminates
unexpected lease oscillations when adding a new node.
@ajwerner ajwerner force-pushed the ajwerner/smooth-lease-transfers-on-consider-rebalance branch from edcf827 to c719214 Compare September 14, 2020 07:26
Copy link
Contributor

@darinpp darinpp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@ajwerner
Copy link
Contributor Author

TFTR!

bors r=darinpp

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 14, 2020

Build failed (retrying...):

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 14, 2020

Build failed (retrying...):

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Build failed (retrying...):

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Build failed:

@ajwerner
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Build failed:

@ajwerner
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 15, 2020

Build succeeded:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants