You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is almost definitely a breaking change, so just something to keep in mind for the future.
Seems like there are a plethora of socket types, which have different kinds of addressing. e.g. AF_UNIX, AF_INET, AF_INET6. Don't know if any of the others are important.
Currently in FS2 we have an awkward SocketGroup and UnixSockets, when (in theory) they can actually be sharing the same machinery. Also, it's possible to use UDP with unix sockets, which the current FS2 encoding also does not support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
armanbilge
changed the title
Suppose unix socket addresses, and possibly arbitrary other address types (?)
Support unix socket addresses, and possibly arbitrary other address types (?)
Feb 10, 2023
This is almost definitely a breaking change, so just something to keep in mind for the future.
Seems like there are a plethora of socket types, which have different kinds of addressing. e.g.
AF_UNIX
,AF_INET
,AF_INET6
. Don't know if any of the others are important.https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/socket.2.html
Currently in FS2 we have an awkward
SocketGroup
andUnixSockets
, when (in theory) they can actually be sharing the same machinery. Also, it's possible to use UDP with unix sockets, which the current FS2 encoding also does not support.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: