Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Honda Manual Gear msg #1034

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vanillagorillaa
Copy link
Contributor

@vanillagorillaa vanillagorillaa commented Apr 13, 2024

Adds a manual transmission gear signal on new ID.

I have a test user with a CVT integra and one with a MT Integra. The CVT does have 0x1DD on CAN bus, but this signal is always 0. On the MT Integra the signal changes based on gear.

Verification : 61e73b2b0226d1a7/0000002a--c9db9c1967 (Integra) and 2d33198e4ff0ee67/00000006--9852f1fdf9 (Civic Type R)

This reverts commit d3489b5.
@vanillagorillaa vanillagorillaa marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2024 16:57
@vanillagorillaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sshane This is ready. Will be used for my Integra car port PR and a Civc Type R PR i'll be opening soon.

@vanillagorillaa vanillagorillaa changed the title WIP: Manual Gear msg Honda Manual Gear msg Jul 6, 2024
@@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ BO_ 467 CRUISE_FAULT_STATUS: 8 XXX
SG_ CHECKSUM : 59|4@0+ (1,0) [0|15] "" XXX
SG_ COUNTER : 61|2@0+ (1,0) [0|3] "" XXX

BO_ 477 GEARBOX_BOH: 8 XXX
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you give this a better name?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GEARBOX_ALT_2, perhaps? Or could do GEARBOX_ALT_A and GEARBOX_ALT_B?

Copy link
Contributor

@sshane sshane Jul 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depends on where this comes from, Toyota calls a similar message CLUTCH. This can be GEARBOX_MANUAL or GEARBOX_MT

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want to do gearbox_manual or gearbox_mt as this message is also found on the CVT transmission vehicles. The GEAR_MT signal only seems to change on MT vehicles while it's always 0 on CVT transmission vehicles. I will go with ALT_2 in order to prevent additional changes needed to support the renaming

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated in c1e1823

Copy link
Contributor

@sshane sshane Jul 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if it exists but is truly unused, those names seem fine to me.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As I recall, on the CVT vehicles, the message itself has data in other bytes, however only on the MT vehicles does GEAR_MT actually have data. On CVT vehicles GEAR_MT is always zero. I'm working on getting access again to the CVT integra device that I can confirm this.

You are saying though that even if there is data in other bytes on the CVT vehicles that you are fine naming the message GEARBOX_MT or GEARBOX_MANUAL ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From this route on a CVT integra you can see that there is other data on this message, but the GEAR_MT signal is always 0. 3f8ae015ce70365f/000000fe--b691f954c2

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants