gap v4.12.2

[regro-cf-autotick-bot]

It is very likely that the current package version for this feedstock is out of date.

Checklist before merging this PR:

• Dependencies have been updated if changed: see upstream
• Tests have passed
• Updated license if changed and license_file is packaged

Information about this PR:

1. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.
2. The bot will almost always only open one PR per version.
3. The bot will stop issuing PRs if more than 3 version bump PRs generated by the bot are open. If you don't want to package a particular version please close the PR.
4. If you want these PRs to be merged automatically, make an issue with @conda-forge-admin,please add bot automerge in the title and merge the resulting PR. This command will add our bot automerge feature to your feedstock.
5. If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

Pending Dependency Version Updates

Here is a list of all the pending dependency version updates for this repo. Please double check all dependencies before merging.

Name	Upstream Version	Current Version
bliss	0.73-1
gap	4.12.2

Dependency Analysis

We couldn't run dependency analysis due to an internal error in the bot. :/ Help is very welcome!

_{This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/autotick-bot/actions/runs/4200475742, please use this URL for debugging.}

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[tobiasdiez]

@isuruf @saraedum Could you please try to merge this upgrade here? Sage is now using v4.12 since sagemath/sage#35093, and due to api changes it no longer builds with v4.11. Thanks!

[dimpase]

It errors out on patching GAP source, specifically:

checking file bin/BuildPackages.sh
Hunk #1 FAILED at 179.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED

This is a script used by the standard GAP way of building/installing packages. Sage is not using it, by the way.

[dimpase]

please merge my fix at regro-cf-autotick-bot#1 to fix the error.

[dimpase]

@saraedum @isuruf

[github-actions]

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

• linter: passed
• azure: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!

[dimpase]

oops, the other patch failed too, sorry. Fix forthcoming

[github-actions]

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

[isuruf]

@conda-forge-admin, rerender

[fingolfin]

I really think it's a bad idea to install a crippled GAP w/o its built-in help.

[fingolfin]

I now see that the documentation is patched out because it is "too heavy". What does that even mean? What is the criterion here? Speaking cynically, that sound as if when I document my code too thoroughly, the result will be deleted by Conda because it is too long? I surely hope that's not the idea...

[fingolfin]

Anyway, other than the documentation question, I think this PR is looking really good now. Thank you very much to all who worked on this!

[dimpase]

SageMath does install GAP's documentation, by the way. I also don't get Conda's rationale for removing it.

…

On Fri, 7 Apr 2023, 11:25 Max Horn, ***@***.***> wrote: Anyway, other than the documentation question, I think this PR is looking really good now. Thank you very much to all who worked on this! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#68 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJXYHAX4M77JDV6JDBHRXTW77TP5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAU67KFR4> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[saraedum]

Thanks for the feedback @fingolfin. Let's get this merged as is, so we don't block the latest sagelib any further. And then we can tweak things further.

[tobiasdiez]

A big thanks to everyone involved, the updated version works well for me with sage!