Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Free-form extra section now required to be a mapping #5125

Open
2 tasks done
mbargull opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Free-form extra section now required to be a mapping #5125

mbargull opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
source::contributor created by a frequent contributor type::documentation request for improved documentation

Comments

@mbargull
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • I added a descriptive title
  • I searched open reports and couldn't find a duplicate

What happened?

gh-5112 added an assumption that the extra section is a mapping.

extra could be anything else (scalar or sequence, not just mapping) acc. to https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda-build/en/stable/resources/define-metadata.html#extra-section .
This broke an assumption in conda-smithy at least: conda-forge/conda-smithy#1816 .

So, technically a breaking change; but I'd be okay with requiring a mapping here.
This needs an update to the docs, though.

Conda Info

No response

Conda Config

No response

Conda list

No response

Additional Context

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
source::contributor created by a frequent contributor type::documentation request for improved documentation
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants