feature request: multiple testing correction

[andreasleha]

If I do not miss anything, there is currently no way to include a multiple comparison correction. This would be a very useful addition.

[const-ae]

Yes, I agree this would indeed be a useful feature. I am not quite sure what would be the best default (Bonferroni, Holm, Benjamini-Hochberg, None?), but adding the possibility for the use to choose any of those makes sense.
Unfortunately I am quite busy right now, so I am not sure when I will have time to implement the feature. Of course if you would be interested in trying, I could give you some pointers where to start.

[sidderb]

I just submitted a pull request with this functionality quickly added - for BH/fdr only. Prior to merging you can try it out here: https://github.com/sidderb/ggsignif

[jchellmuth]

ggsignif works very nicely and is incredibly useful with facet_wrap. If the BH/FDR option could recognize the number of facets and correct accordingly, that would be great !

[antagomir]

I would also have great use for multiple testing option-

[iferres]

+1 for this feature.
Thanks for the package, btw!

[TahelRonel]

Was this feature added? If so, where do I find how to use it?
Otherwise, is there another way to use e.g. pairwise.wilcox.test as the test?
Many thanks.

[elnaggarj]

I've incorporated sidderb FDR functionality to the newest version of ggsignif. Please find at ggsignif-FDR