Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update typescript-eslint monorepo to v3.4.0 #1972

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 22, 2020

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin devDependencies minor 3.3.0 -> 3.4.0
@typescript-eslint/parser devDependencies minor 3.3.0 -> 3.4.0

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint

v3.4.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] handle intersection types (#​2170) (9cca3a9)
  • eslint-plugin: [unbound-method] handling destructuring (#​2228) (c3753c2)
  • experimental-utils: correct types for TS versions older than 3.8 (#​2217) (5e4dda2)
  • experimental-utils: getParserServices takes a readonly context (#​2235) (26da8de)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] add option to check nullable booleans (#​1983) (c0b3057)
  • eslint-plugin: add extension rule no-loss-of-precision (#​2196) (535b0f2)

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@escapedcat escapedcat merged commit f8e1b71 into master Jun 23, 2020
@escapedcat escapedcat deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch June 23, 2020 01:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants