Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Timeline of contribution is not proper #97

Closed
aparnacoronasafe opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #224
Closed

Bug: Timeline of contribution is not proper #97

aparnacoronasafe opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #224
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@aparnacoronasafe
Copy link
Member

aparnacoronasafe commented Oct 21, 2022

https://contributors.ohc.network/contributors/sainak

The last 5 entries here at the bottom are from June.

Above that, we see updates from May. Above that again June and then July and the more recent months according to the timeline.

The timeline must start with May at the bottom and then have June above that.

@Ritesh-Aggarwal Ritesh-Aggarwal self-assigned this Oct 22, 2022
@Ritesh-Aggarwal
Copy link
Contributor

image

currently the contibutions are shown in the following manner:

  • github contributions (new to old)
  • slack messages (old to new)

@aparnacoronasafe
There is some issue in entries from may 11 to may 22 apart from that,
I think it is supposed to be that way so that user can start looking at slack messages from bottom and github's from top.
Should I change the behaviour anyway?

@Ritesh-Aggarwal Ritesh-Aggarwal added the question Further information is requested label Oct 25, 2022
@Ritesh-Aggarwal Ritesh-Aggarwal removed their assignment Jan 24, 2023
@rithviknishad rithviknishad added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed question Further information is requested labels Feb 17, 2024
rithviknishad added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants