-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Normalize metrics by area #63
Comments
mhh I don't have a strong opinion. |
There's no straightfoward answer to this question. Sometimes it is important to normalise by area, particularly for active transport because area scales with distance, which has a definite effect. Sometimes it is also equally important to scale for local population densities. And sometimes it is important to scale for both. My instinctive guess would be that the notional attempt to scale IRIS polygons to equal populations should generally mean that post-hoc scaling shouldn't be done. |
Ok, I think we should drop it and let the city work on it as they see fit :) Thanks everyone! |
Benoit suggested we normalize metrics by area, since the area of each IRIS varies considerably.
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: