-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Screening run tutorial, only one compound predicted #1
Comments
Hi, The file For the best parameters to tweak to obtain more results, please read the "Optimizing PyRMD Performance" section in the README of the repository. |
Thank you. In the documentation, it mentions you can provide non-Chembl data as well. How does it have to be formatted? Many thanks |
PyRMD should be able to read any text-based tabular data files, such as .smi SMILES files and .csv files, as long as they contain a column of SMILES strings. If for some reason the file cannot be read by PyRMD, you could make sure that the file includes a column named "Title" and another named "Smiles". And that the file uses commas as separators |
Thank you. Does it read a column for activity as well for the non-Chembl data files or just SMILES strings? |
If you tell PyRMD in the configuration file to use non-Chembl data, then it will search only for two values in the tabular file -- a column with SMILES strings and their associated name. If you want to use activities in a non-Chembl file you'll have to manually format it like a Chembl file. Check the SI of the PyRMD manuscript to know exactly what PyRMD looks for in a Chembl file. |
Hello,
I have installed and run the tutorial sets both benchmarked and screening. So far so good, I have noticed that in the resulting file
database_predcitions.csv
I only have 1 molecule from MCule. What are the parameters to tweak to produce more results?Many thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: