Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cgosecp256k1 verification (backport #11298) #11360

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 10, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #11298 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 361c837 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/release/v0.45.x/pr-11298
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/release/v0.45.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 361c837e5.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   Makefile
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/curve.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/dummy.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/README.md
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/contrib/dummy.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/dummy.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/include/dummy.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/src/asm/field_10x26_arm.s
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/src/dummy.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/src/modules/dummy.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/src/modules/ecdh/dummy.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/src/modules/recovery/dummy.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/panic_cb.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/scalar_mult_cgo.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/scalar_mult_nocgo.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/secp256.go
	new file:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/secp256_test.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/secp256k1_cgo.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/secp256k1_cgo_test.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/secp256k1_nocgo.go
	modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/secp256k1_nocgo_test.go

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   CHANGELOG.md
	both modified:   crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/README.md

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

## Description

Closes: #10747

- update secp256k1 cgo fork,
- debug verify bytes

```
benchmark                     old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     407           413           +1.35%
BenchmarkSigning-10           95099         36754         -61.35%
BenchmarkVerification-10      215551        48053         -77.71%

benchmark                     old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     2              2              +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           83             4              -95.18%
BenchmarkVerification-10      74             1              -98.65%

benchmark                     old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     96            96            +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           5283          196           -96.29%
BenchmarkVerification-10      3537          32            -99.10%
```

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 361c837)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/README.md
@tac0turtle tac0turtle merged commit a4644a3 into release/v0.45.x Mar 11, 2022
@tac0turtle tac0turtle deleted the mergify/bp/release/v0.45.x/pr-11298 branch March 11, 2022 11:09
JimLarson pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
* fix: cgosecp256k1 verification (cosmos#11298)

## Description

Closes: cosmos#10747

- update secp256k1 cgo fork,
- debug verify bytes

```
benchmark                     old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     407           413           +1.35%
BenchmarkSigning-10           95099         36754         -61.35%
BenchmarkVerification-10      215551        48053         -77.71%

benchmark                     old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     2              2              +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           83             4              -95.18%
BenchmarkVerification-10      74             1              -98.65%

benchmark                     old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     96            96            +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           5283          196           -96.29%
BenchmarkVerification-10      3537          32            -99.10%
```

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 361c837)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/README.md

* fix conflicts

Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
randy75828 pushed a commit to Switcheo/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
* fix: cgosecp256k1 verification (cosmos#11298)

## Description

Closes: cosmos#10747

- update secp256k1 cgo fork,
- debug verify bytes

```
benchmark                     old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     407           413           +1.35%
BenchmarkSigning-10           95099         36754         -61.35%
BenchmarkVerification-10      215551        48053         -77.71%

benchmark                     old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     2              2              +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           83             4              -95.18%
BenchmarkVerification-10      74             1              -98.65%

benchmark                     old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     96            96            +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           5283          196           -96.29%
BenchmarkVerification-10      3537          32            -99.10%
```

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 361c837)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/README.md

* fix conflicts

Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
randy75828 pushed a commit to Switcheo/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
* fix: cgosecp256k1 verification (cosmos#11298)

## Description

Closes: cosmos#10747

- update secp256k1 cgo fork,
- debug verify bytes

```
benchmark                     old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     407           413           +1.35%
BenchmarkSigning-10           95099         36754         -61.35%
BenchmarkVerification-10      215551        48053         -77.71%

benchmark                     old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     2              2              +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           83             4              -95.18%
BenchmarkVerification-10      74             1              -98.65%

benchmark                     old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     96            96            +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           5283          196           -96.29%
BenchmarkVerification-10      3537          32            -99.10%
```

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 361c837)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	crypto/keys/secp256k1/internal/secp256k1/README.md

* fix conflicts

Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Eengineer1 pushed a commit to cheqd/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
* fix: cgosecp256k1 verification (cosmos#11298)

Closes: cosmos#10747

- update secp256k1 cgo fork,
- debug verify bytes

```
benchmark                     old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     407           413           +1.35%
BenchmarkSigning-10           95099         36754         -61.35%
BenchmarkVerification-10      215551        48053         -77.71%

benchmark                     old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     2              2              +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           83             4              -95.18%
BenchmarkVerification-10      74             1              -98.65%

benchmark                     old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkKeyGeneration-10     96            96            +0.00%
BenchmarkSigning-10           5283          196           -96.29%
BenchmarkVerification-10      3537          32            -99.10%
```

---

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 361c837)

* fix conflicts

Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant