Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(core/02-client): remove legacy proposal types. #6782

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim commented Jul 8, 2024

Description

Will add these to changelog/migration docs

#5666 (comment)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim force-pushed the jim/5666-remove-legacy-gov-handlers-types branch from f4fe311 to 5e8e253 Compare July 9, 2024 10:59
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2024 11:00
Comment on lines -561 to -562
proposal := clienttypes.NewClientUpdateProposal(ibctesting.Title, ibctesting.Description, subjectClientID, substituteClientID)
s.ExecuteAndPassGovV1Beta1Proposal(ctx, cosmosChain, cosmosWallet, proposal)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe there's no other sensible thing to do here now, right? (Not that we run these tests atm, but that's besides the point)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what version did we release wasm in. This should fail compatibility if tested on pre v8

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it would but we don't run compat for 08-wasm. This is typical problem with rm'ing types in newer versions that are used in compat tests. We could get em in e2e if you feel like this is a must. Will slam this in for now.

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim changed the title chore: remove legacy proposal types. chore(core/02-client): remove legacy proposal types. Jul 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@chatton chatton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks!

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 9, 2024

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e76766a Jul 9, 2024
30 checks passed
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim deleted the jim/5666-remove-legacy-gov-handlers-types branch July 9, 2024 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants