-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2637 R3 Member visit #1303
Comments
P2637R1 Member visit (Barry Revzin) |
2022-10-04 Library Evolution TeleconP2637R0: Member visit and apply 2022-10-04 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes Chair: Nevin Liber Champion: Tim Song Minute Taker: Inbal Levi POLL: Remove std::apply from P2637.
Attendance: 18 # of Authors: 0 Author Position: Outcome: Weak consensus in favor WA: Trust the experience of the author for the usability POLL: Should we hold up this paper until we have investigated a variadic visit?
Attendance: 17 # of Authors: 0 Author Position: Outcome: Consensus against POLL: Should the next version of this paper remove the constraint (from 1.4) which rejects those cases where a type might inherit privately from variant.
Attendance: 16 # of Authors: 0 Author Position: Outcome: Consensus in favor WA: Don't see the need to support this POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing P2637 Member Visit, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work.
Attendance: 17 # of Authors: 0 Author Position: Outcome: Consensus in favor WA: I think we need language changes before we pursue these types of ergonomic things. SummaryTODO: @nliber Next StepsTODO: @nliber |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Thank you for noticing. That was indeed an error and should be Consensus in favor. fixed. |
@brycelelbach FYI there's already an R1 of the paper, with the requested changes (no |
2022-04-11 Library Evolution TeleconP2637R1: Member visit and apply 2023-04-11 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes Champion: Barry Revzin Chair: Nevin Liber Minute Taker: Ben Craig POLL: Deprecate std::visit_format_arg as part of P2637.
Attendance: 23 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: N Outcome: Weak consensus in favor SA: No discussion, only impact POLL: Modify P2637R1 (Member visit) by deprecating std::format_visit_arg, and then send the revised paper to LWG for C++26 classified as B2, to be confirmed with a Library Evolution electronic poll.
Attendance: 23 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF Outcome: Consensus in favor Next StepsModify P2637R1 (Member visit) by deprecating std::format_visit_arg, and then send the revised paper to LWG for C++26 classified as B2, to be confirmed with a Library Evolution electronic poll. |
P2637R2 will be in the 2023-05 mailing. |
LWG reviewed and approved for C++26 in Varna on Tue afternoon (notes to follow) Poll: add [[http://wg21.link/p2637r3][p2637r3]] to C++26? |F|A|N| |
2023-05 Library Evolution Electronic Poll OutcomesPoll 7: Send [[P2637R2]] Member
Outcome: Consensus in favor. |
P2637R3 Member visit (Barry Revzin) |
Approved in Varna 2023 and applied to the draft (cplusplus/draft#6307) |
P2637R0 Member visit and apply (Barry Revzin)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: