XmlMethodCall.java:35-37: This class XmlMethodCall should...

[0pdd]

The puzzle 440-332bf733 from #440 has to be resolved:

https://github.com/yegor256/jpeek/blob/94b2e98a33d57f864f7ac8a82ae373de11cc5f20/src/main/java/org/jpeek/graph/XmlMethodCall.java#L35-L37

The puzzle was created by Victor Noël on 09-Apr-20.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[0crat]

@paulodamaso/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

The job #443 assigned to @vzurauskas/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

[vzurauskas]

@paulodamaso XmlMethodCall expects an XML in its constructor. Can you clarify whether this XML is supposed to be method, or op from within the method? Judging from the name of the class ("call" is a type of "op") and the way this class is used in XmlGraph, it should expect an op, but the way it's implemented, it expects a method: it expects the XML to contain name and args, and as far as I can tell, op elements don't have them.

[vzurauskas]

@0crat wait for an answer

[vzurauskas]

@paulodamaso ping

[paulodamaso]

@vzurauskas Seems that it is supposed to be a method

[vzurauskas]

@paulodamaso I stumbled upon this comment today. It turns out there are plans to enhance the op element with everything required for XmlMethodCall as it is now. So turns out it's an op after all.

[0pdd]

The puzzle 440-332bf733 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

[0crat]

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @vzurauskas/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[sereshqua]

@0crat quality good

[sereshqua]

@0crat quality good

[0crat]

@0crat quality good (here)

@sereshqua There is no quality review for #443, no performer