-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[request] Total storage by type and some others #13
Comments
Thanks for the feedback. Here's some thoughts:
|
For the simple one:
And the complex one: For what I read on reddit station tend to have a maximum storage capacity to let run factory unattented for 6h to 9h, so to be safe taking a base of 12h seems good. I don't really know if it's overkill or not yet. You could also make a soft and hard line, between 6h and 12h in orange and 12h+ in green. I would calculate it like that for final product: For food rations in my exemple it would be: 3 x 4920 x 1.25 x 1 x 12 = 221400 m3 To put it in an pratical exemple, here my food & Medical complex that would supply all other complex I would do: Wares: Total: Well I say 12h but 9h would also be good and I'm not sure about the Ice (solid ware in general). I'm not playing a lot so I can't really check between a planned complex and an actual complex in game. |
Came here to suggest storage required as well - it's something that would benefit the tool hugely and bring it to the next level. Since we already know output and input values in quantity, if the "storage size" of each ware and resource is added to the database too, it would be fairly trivial to calculate storage required for a production cycle both input/output wise. This would make station planning much more convenient :) |
An objection to
The correct output would be 2x Argon L Container Storage ... |
Well first, great job on this app :)
I tested some complex and the "problems" i can point out are:
If I had some free time i would look into it myself but unfortunatly that won't be the case soon, so i leave it too you to decide what to implement or not :) and sorry for the bad english ^^
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: