Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add fsGroup and or supplementalGroups to all relevant kube examples for consistency #32

Closed
jmccormick2001 opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@jmccormick2001
Copy link
Contributor

fsGroup and or supplementalGroups

to avoid persistent disk issues, the use of fsGroup and/or supplementalGroups is used
in the spec examples....all of the kube/ose examples need to reflect this.

@jmccormick2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmccormick2001 commented Nov 3, 2016

use this when NFS is the storage type, set the group IDs to match that of the NFS group ID...

"supplementalGroups": [
5555,
6666
]

for NFS , supplementalGroups is the method to use, not fsGroup, for block storage use fsGroup...confusing? surely not!

@jmccormick2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

merged, now all NFS examples will use supplementalGroups, the OSE dedicated will use fsGroup since those are targeted towards a Dedicated envionrment that uses AWS block storage which requires fsGroup instead. The dedicated template examples could be duplicated to provide a set of templates for non-block storage at some future point.

jmccormick2001 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant