Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) supports #2

Closed
Neustradamus opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) supports #2

Neustradamus opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Sep 6, 2019

After:

  • SCRAM-SHA-1

Can you add supports of :

  • SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-224
  • SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-256
  • SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-384
  • SCRAM-SHA-384-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA-512
  • SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
  • SCRAM-SHA3-512
  • SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS

"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html

-PLUS variants:

LDAP:

  • RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:

2FA:

IANA:

Linked to:

@cryptoarashi
Copy link
Collaborator

This is out of the scope of this repo as this is a simple XMPP message (de)serialization. Mechanisms are covered by the go-xmppc package.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

@cryptoarashi: Any news more one year after?
Always only SCRAM-SHA-1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants