Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EMIRGE method choice #28

Closed
domenico-simone opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

EMIRGE method choice #28

domenico-simone opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@domenico-simone
Copy link

Hello,

I would like to try EMIRGE on metatranscriptome reads. Indeed I have already sorted the putative SSU reads out with cmsearch. Would you suggest using the normal EMIRGE version or the amplicon variant?

Thanks,
Domenico

@csmiller
Copy link
Owner

csmiller commented Nov 9, 2016

I'd recommend the amplicon version for speed, but you might have to restrict the run to a few million reads depending on RAM and patience. If you try this and have other insights or suggestions, let everyone know here:
https://groups.google.com/group/emirge-users
Chris

@csmiller csmiller closed this as completed Nov 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants