Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Siammask active tracker to run for more frames #7639

Closed
2 tasks done
siddtmb opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done

Allow Siammask active tracker to run for more frames #7639

siddtmb opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@siddtmb
Copy link

siddtmb commented Mar 19, 2024

Actions before raising this issue

  • I searched the existing issues and did not find anything similar.
  • I read/searched the docs

I hope this does not get taken down as a duplicate. The previous issue was closed without ever being resolved to my knowledge/understanding. If I am wrong in my understanding, please guide me.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I don't know why the automatic annotation for "Allow Siammask active tracker to run for more frames" was closed, at the moment, it can only run on the frame you are on and is incredibly slow. Let me know if I am incorrect in my understanding, if so, how do I make it run for the next 100 frames?

Describe the solution you'd like

If v is pressed (skip with jump) just annotate all the frames till that jump in a single server request. Or let us set the number of future frames to auto-annotate in some config or option menu.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I could keep pressing F key for hours on my computer... I shouldn't have to mention why that is very undesirable. Makes this useless and unusable, especially with how slow siammask runs at the moment. It is odd because the official implementation is blazing fast.

Additional context

There was a previous issue that was closed and it seems it was closed without ever actually addressing the issue.

@siddtmb siddtmb added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 19, 2024
@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

Dublicate #5686 #7515

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants