Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of a serverless tracking function with support for tracking by masks and polygons. #7982

Closed
2 tasks done
DaniilKrich opened this issue Jun 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DaniilKrich
Copy link

DaniilKrich commented Jun 4, 2024

Actions before raising this issue

  • I searched the existing issues and did not find anything similar.
  • I read/searched the docs

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I am interested in implementing the Track-Anything tool in CVAT for ai tracking, but I've encountered a limitation where CVAT does not support tracking for masks or polygons. Currently, the input and output data for AI tracking are confined to bounding boxes (bboxes) only.

Additionally, there's an issue with the tracking in the serverless function setup, where only the image is passed without any additional contextual information, such as frame numbers. This lack of information restricts potential functionalities in implementation.
example:
image: /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgAAAQABA...UAAAaZURVZaBGW2AQAV//2Q==
shapes: [
[
737,
686,
742,
702
]
]...
state:[...]

And, I have found that it is not possible to track a pre-defined area, whether it has been prepared manually, or via a detector or interactor. This is a significant limitation in the context of our work.

Could we consider enhancing the system to support tracking masks and polygons, and maybe provide more contextual data in the serverless function call? These changes could greatly improve the capabilities and versatility of CVAT

@DaniilKrich DaniilKrich added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 4, 2024
@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

Polygon tracks are supported.
Mask tracks are not supported and we are not planning to implement it currently.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants