"Walk the graph" user story (née Path)

[smurp]

Starting at one node and working away from that node, click by click, leaving visible a trail back to the origin node and showing the nodes adjacent to the current one. One can see where one has walked because there are breadcrumbs left behind in the form of links between nodes back to the origin.

@smurp took the liberty of changing the name of this from Path to Walk so it was a verb.

[smurp]

Engage the Walk verb then click on a Class in the class picker. Boom! (Understandably!) Presumably also Sets are a no-go for the Walk verb. We should perhaps put the "shield" or whatever that's called over the Classes and the Sets when Walk is engaged. The shield is what covers up the classes when a set is engaged. @wolfmaul

[SusanBrown]

Agree! On Jan 8, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Shawn Murphy <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: Engage the Walk verb then click on a Class in the class picker. Boom! (Understandably!) Presumably also Sets are a no-go for the Walk verb. We should perhaps put the "shield" or whatever that's called over the Classes and the Sets when Walk is engaged. The shield is what covers up the classes when a set is engaged. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#222 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAhUoKflLesRI5IQe73HYvHWaG91RUGDks5vBLhsgaJpZM4ZIrG4>.

[antimony27]

@smurp Can we please change the colour of the walking path when in dark mode? The blue doesn't show up clearly during presentations. Thanks!

[antimony27]

Still buggy in its interaction with other verbs. @smurp to check.

[smurp]

There are complexities in the relationship Walk | Wander other verbs which put things in the graph. Same thing with #209