We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, Dr. Zhu, I'm processing the RNA part of Paired-seq data using Seurat following these codes
counts <- Read10X('./data/Adult_Cerebrail_Cortex/Adult_CTX_RNA/') metadata <- read.csv('./data/Adult_Cerebrail_Cortex/Cell_embeddings.csv') rownames(metadata) <- metadata$ID metadata <- metadata[colnames(RNA),] RNA$batch <- metadata$Rep RNA$cluster <- metadata$Cluster RNA$true <- as.character(factor(metadata$Cluster,labels = c('AS','MG','OC','Ex1','Ex2','Ex3','In1','In2','In3'))) RNA <- NormalizeData(RNA) RNA <- FindVariableFeatures(RNA) LabelPoints(plot = VariableFeaturePlot(RNA), points = head(VariableFeatures(RNA), 10), repel = TRUE) RNA <- ScaleData(RNA) RNA <- RunPCA(RNA) RNA <- RunUMAP(RNA, dims = 1:20) DimPlot(RNA, group.by = "true", label = TRUE) + NoLegend()
But I got this strange UMAP output of the RNA data
Similarly, I process the ATAC part of Paired-seq data using Signac following these codes
counts <- Read10X("./data/Adult_Cerebrail_Cortex/Adult_CTX_DNA/") chrom_assay <- CreateChromatinAssay(counts,sep = c(":", "-")) ATAC <- CreateSeuratObject(chrom_assay,assay = "ATAC") ATAC <- RunTFIDF(ATAC) ATAC <- FindTopFeatures(ATAC, min.cutoff = 'q0') ATAC <- RunSVD(ATAC) DepthCor(ATAC,n = 50) ATAC <- RunUMAP(ATAC, dims = 2:30, reduction = 'lsi') metadata <- read.csv('./data/Adult_Cerebrail_Cortex/Cell_embeddings.csv') rownames(metadata) <- metadata$ID metadata <- metadata[colnames(ATAC),] ATAC$batch <- metadata$Rep ATAC$cluster <- metadata$Cluster ATAC$true <- as.character(factor(metadata$Cluster, labels = c('AS','MG','OC','Ex1','Ex2','Ex3','In1','In2','In3'))) DimPlot(object = ATAC, label = T,group.by = 'true') + NoLegend()
And I got this
Could you please give me some suggestions on how to deal with Pair-seq data in a proper way? Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @Telogen,
Thank you for your interest in our data. We used snapATAC to process the data, please refer to https://github.com/cxzhu/Paired-seq/blob/master/snapATAC_RNA.R and https://github.com/cxzhu/Paired-seq/blob/master/snapATAC_DNA.R, which is designed for lower-coverage datasets.
You can also find our latest data with higher coverage, which should be more compatible with the current Seurat and Signac, from https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE152nnn/GSE152020/suppl/GSE152020_Paired-Tag_RNA_filtered_matrix.tar.gz and https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/series/GSE152nnn/GSE152020/suppl/GSE152020_Paired-seq_DNA_filtered_matrix.tar.gz
Best, Chenxu
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks Dr. Zhu! I'll try it.
No branches or pull requests
Hi, Dr. Zhu,
I'm processing the RNA part of Paired-seq data using Seurat following these codes
But I got this strange UMAP output of the RNA data
Similarly, I process the ATAC part of Paired-seq data using Signac following these codes
And I got this
Could you please give me some suggestions on how to deal with Pair-seq data in a proper way? Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: