Log scales may generate no ticks for small domains.

[mbostock]

If the difference between the smallest and largest values in the domain is small relative to their absolute value, then log.ticks can return the empty array. For example:

d3_scale.log().domain([42, 43]).ticks(); // []

In this case, it’d probably be best for the log scale to fallback to the behavior of a standard linear scale. Although, it’s probably appropriate to continue to use an exponential tick format?

[mbostock]

(Of course in this case the log scale is essentially equivalent to a linear scale, but it’d be nice if the log scale still did the right thing.)

[cbryan-risklens]

Hey @mbostock, it looks like #49 and #129 were created to fix this issue. If the code is to your satisfaction, can you merge one of them? My team is running into this issue.

[rostislavprovodenko]

This issue is still present in 5.7.2:
d3.scaleLog().domain([41, 42]).ticks()
returns an empty array. please recommend a workaround

[shanmuksai]

This issue is still present in 5.16.0:
d3.scaleLog().domain([41, 42]).ticks()
now i was implicity forming scale with
d3Scale.scaleLog().domain([41, 42]).ticks()

[Fil]

It was fixed in d3-scale@3 which is not yet part of the D3 bundle. Will ship with d3@6. In the meantime you could try require("d3-scale@3")

[shanmuksai]

@Fil
Thanks for your response for the response, for now, I was using "d3-scale" for now.