Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ability to omit implementation details #3

Open
shlevy opened this issue Feb 22, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Ability to omit implementation details #3

shlevy opened this issue Feb 22, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@shlevy
Copy link

shlevy commented Feb 22, 2020

If I omit struct_type or values, the bitmask! macro should be able to figure out how big the field needs to be and assign each flag ascending bits in that field.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@shlevy