-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide alternatives to "[ENCRYPTED]" storage values for other field types. #40
Comments
This issue will be a critical blocker for sites that need to encrypt financial data, for example. It already is for me.
|
If I recall, we had to set values because the solution did not work without it. (e.g. something in core was expecting some value). Theres two avenues here...
|
I have created a new PR that sets some sensible placeholder values, based on the property data type. We should indeed probably explore how we can let Drupal core know that there is a particular value for the field (stored encrypted elsewhere), without having to provide a placeholder. But until we've found a way to handle that (if possible at all), the PR at least makes sure that current core field types don't result in errors when trying to encrypt them. |
This is a follow-up to #38
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: