Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting use of MaxEnt model in the identity.test function #210

Closed
FernandoMoroC opened this issue Jun 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Setting use of MaxEnt model in the identity.test function #210

FernandoMoroC opened this issue Jun 18, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@FernandoMoroC
Copy link

How can I set features and regularization coefficient in MaxEnt model when I use type="mx" in identity.test?

@danlwarren
Copy link
Owner

You should be able to just pass in a "params" vector just as if you were calling it from enmtools.maxent().

@tinsman
Copy link

tinsman commented Mar 29, 2022

Hi @danlwarren, I used ENMeval to pick some appropriate maxent parameters for the two species I'd like to compare using the identity test. I settled on different parameters for both species. (e.g. L 4 for Species A, which has fewer points than Species B, for which the model built using LQH 1 performs best).
What parameters would you recommend for the pseudo-replicates in that case? Average the regularization multipliers? Select the most (or least) complex features? Blob them both together, re-run ENMeval, and see what comes out there? I wonder what makes the most biological sense.

@danlwarren
Copy link
Owner

My own personal preference is to go with the simplest model that works reasonably well, but that's just based on my own intuition that these things tend to emphasize discrimination accuracy more than they should, at the expense of biological plausibility. The idea of running the two together is interesting, though, and might be worth pursuing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants