Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/f seechunks + question #5

Closed
minijaham opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

/f seechunks + question #5

minijaham opened this issue May 6, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@minijaham
Copy link

minijaham commented May 6, 2020

Please make sure your issue complies with these guidelines:

    • Idea must have not been suggested previously
    • Be detailed on what you want & make sure the idea is plausible

Description

One suggestion is /f seechunks where it let's you see the chunks you are in with particles around it.

Extra Information

And the question is...in /f claim, does it claim a chunk or claims an area? Can you claim multiple times?

(edit: soz looked through the codes and it was chunks .-. now my question is doen to can I claim multiple times.)

Also +question. In the claims, can you open chests in other claimed area? It was an issue with FactionsPE and it sucked pp cuz people could only destroy chests with tnt

@Aericio
Copy link
Collaborator

Aericio commented May 6, 2020

/f seechunk / /f sc to see chunks.

More than one land claim is supported, with each chunk requiring 1 power. This value is modifiable in the configuration.

You should not be able to open chests in other's claims, however if you find some exploit then report it.

@minijaham
Copy link
Author

Is there a way to change so people can open containers in others claims..?

@Aericio
Copy link
Collaborator

Aericio commented May 6, 2020

Oh, I misunderstood what you meant.

@Aericio Aericio changed the title Suggestion + Question /f seechunks + question May 6, 2020
@minijaham
Copy link
Author

Oof

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants