Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider the usage of Flurl #20

Open
Lakritzator opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Consider the usage of Flurl #20

Lakritzator opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@Lakritzator
Labels
question

Comments

@Lakritzator
Copy link
Member

At the beginning Flurl(.Http) was not an option, this is why Dapplo.HttpExtensions was written.
Currently the project is well maintained, only a few options seem to missing so it might be usefull to consider using Flurl(.Http) by seeing how far we get and contribute to the project.
@Lakritzator Lakritzator self-assigned this Apr 13, 2017
@Lakritzator
Copy link
Member Author

Lakritzator commented Apr 13, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Advantages would be to have better PCL etc support.
Disadvantages seem to be that the settings are very global...

@Lakritzator
Copy link
Member Author

Need to reevaluate this, as by now the community of Flurl got a lot bigger and also has the attention of the .NET Foundation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Lakritzator Lakritzator

Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Lakritzator