We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
/area runtime
/area operator
/area placement
/area docs
/area test-and-release
Now Dapr can work well with Service Mesh, while once use Service Mesh, one extra jump cannot be avoided.
If Dapr supports Unix domain socket to passthrough to Service Mesh, there would be a great acceleration, as result in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14973942/tcp-loopback-connection-vs-unix-domain-socket-performance said.
Also, if Dapr listens to Unix domain socket, APP can passthrough to it then make acceleration too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree, we recently looked into this. If you can create a POC and post your findings here that would be awesome.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This seems to be a duplicate of #2864
daixiang0
No branches or pull requests
In what area(s)?
/area runtime
Describe the proposal
Now Dapr can work well with Service Mesh, while once use Service Mesh, one extra jump cannot be avoided.
If Dapr supports Unix domain socket to passthrough to Service Mesh, there would be a great acceleration, as result in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14973942/tcp-loopback-connection-vs-unix-domain-socket-performance said.
Also, if Dapr listens to Unix domain socket, APP can passthrough to it then make acceleration too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: