Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dapi-client): expect 100 but got 122 in SML provider test #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

antouhou
Copy link
Collaborator

@antouhou antouhou commented Nov 8, 2021

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Error in SML provider test

What was done?

Made call interval higher than the update interval, so mock gets called a proper amount of times without race conditions

How Has This Been Tested?

Run the tests multiple times

Breaking Changes

None

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Copy link
Collaborator

@shuplenkov shuplenkov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@shumkov shumkov added this to the v0.21.x milestone Nov 8, 2021
@shumkov shumkov changed the title fix: expect 100 but got 122 in SML provider test fix(dapi-client): expect 100 but got 122 in SML provider test Nov 8, 2021
@shumkov shumkov merged commit 10062ef into master Nov 8, 2021
@shumkov shumkov deleted the fix_expect_100_but_got_122 branch November 8, 2021 14:54
shumkov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
fix: fix build on grovedb master, avoid binary strings
shumkov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants