-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
partial merge #13697, #18591, #19387, #18468: update constructors to match c++20 draft spec #4036
Conversation
Neither PR title nor description mention the merge of 18388 and the partial merge of 18468. Looks good otherwise imo. |
Must have forgotten, bitcoin#18388 is a partial merge as segwit specific logic wasn't merged in (source). I didn't touch bitcoin#18469 so I'm not sure about mentioning it. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good overall but also gave me a bit of the partially thing feeling like mentioned in the other PR 😄
utACK
17f15e4
to
1be361a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one nit, LGTM otherwise
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
utACK (compiles with and without --enable-c++17
locally with no issues)
EDIT: remote build (on ubuntu) with --enable-c++17
fails though, #4055 should fix it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK, however please squash all the related (from the same PR) commits together
imo let's mark 18591 and 18388 as not-partial merges. The excluded changes in both are things we aren't really going to go back to later, otherwise looks good |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Overview
As part of #4025, component pull requests that are required by TorV3 logic are being broken down into branches wherever feasable. This PR deals with implementation of
Span
.Contents
span.h
. The rest are not relevant in regards to partial #8149 and merge #19845, #19954: Complete the BIP155 implementation and upgrade to TORv3 #4025 and have been skipped.Merge of span: update constructors to match c++20 draft spec and add lifetimebound attribute bitcoin/bitcoin#19387 ("span: update constructors to match c++20 draft spec and add lifetimebound attribute" by theuni)e3e7446 has been cherry-picked as 278a71c in partial merge #13815: Add [[nodiscard]] to all {Decode,Parse}[...](...) functions returning bool #4035, completing the mergeEDIT: DO NOT MERGE THIS UNTIL #4035 IS MERGED. THE PR WILL BE REBASED ON TOP OF THAT AND THEN e8782af WILL BE ADDED, THEN IT IS FIT FOR MERGEResolved with 1be361a