Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backport: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22337 #6130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

vijaydasmp
Copy link

bitcoin backport

Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp force-pushed the bp23_98_2 branch 2 times, most recently from 8413f62 to 36c5569 Compare August 3, 2024 10:09
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2024 08:45
@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

vijaydasmp commented Aug 4, 2024

Hello @UdjinM6, @knst , @PastaPastaPasta requesting review

@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

Hello @UdjinM6 , @PastaPastaPasta requesting review

@UdjinM6
Copy link

UdjinM6 commented Aug 14, 2024

Needs rebase to fix Check Merge Fast-Forward Only

UdjinM6
UdjinM6 previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2024
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 0f7d842

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

PastaPastaPasta commented Aug 25, 2024

For some reason you rebased this on a commit from like a month ago? can you rebase on latest develop? I like the added signature though!

Note: the rebase to 62b11c4 looks clean, commit is same, but I'd prefer not merging in from a really old based branch

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK c8ae089

rebase is clean

@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

rebased from latest , @UdjinM6 had approved the changes earlier , rebasing removed the approval, I will request again

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK c8ae089

92993aa Change SignTransaction's input_errors to use bilingual_str (Andrew Chow)
171366e Use bilingual_str for address fetching functions (Andrew Chow)
9571c69 Add bilingual_str::clear() (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  In a couple of places in the wallet, errors are `std::string`. In order for these errors to be translated, change them to use `bilingual_str`.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    re-ACK 92993aa, only rebased since my [previous](bitcoin#22337 (review)) review, verified with
  klementtan:
    Code review ACK 92993aa
  meshcollider:
    Code review ACK 92993aa

Tree-SHA512: 5400e419dd87db8c49b67ed0964de2d44b58010a566ca246f2f0760ed9ef6a9b6f6df7a6adcb211b315b74c727bfe8c7d07eb5690b5922fa5828ceef4c83461f
Signed-off-by: Vijay <vijaydas.mp@gmail.com>
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 9bcda44 into dashpay:develop Aug 28, 2024
29 of 31 checks passed
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 21.2 milestone Aug 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants