-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Too large queries produce MaxRetryError #413
Comments
@rth Can you please enable debug logging and share the log?
Also, can you try to access that failed link using wget/curl/browser? I'm curious if there are some SSL issues on server, or if that's something on our side |
+ additional question: do you use any kind of proxy, firewall, VPN, or something that may affect ssl cert validation? |
+ if you are able to path |
Thanks for your feedback @kravets-levko ! Yes, I'm behind a corporate proxy that does SSL cerificate rewrites, so by itself SSLError s are expected. Any chance you could allows users to disable ssl verification in that section without editing the code? For instance either via the If still relevant some of the debug logs in the first case where it failed are below,
|
The thing is that for smaller results CloudFetch is not used, that's why you were able to get result. Thank you for your help and all the feedback you provide, and also I really appreciate that you were able to help me with debugging. PR will come in a minute |
Previously when a too big query was made #383 we got 0 rows as output (as discussed in that issue) . With the changes in #405 for me it now produces an MaxRetryError which is better but the error message is misleading (and also retying so many times is slow).
The minimal code I'm using is,
If the query is small, it works with no warnings.
If the query is too big produces the following MaxRetryError with a nested SSLError. There is no way to detect a too big query in the HTTP response status without retying N times and reaching MaxRetryError? And also I have the impression that _tls_no_verify is not passed somewhere in this case, which produces those SSLError. cc @kravets-levko
Versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: