Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Bug] [dlink-admin] UDF重复，导致Dlink无法重启的问题 Duplicate key com.dlink.function.data.model.UDF #1876

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
ixiekun opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

[Bug] [dlink-admin] UDF重复，导致Dlink无法重启的问题 Duplicate key com.dlink.function.data.model.UDF #1876

ixiekun opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
Fixed the bug has fixed

Comments

@ixiekun
Copy link

ixiekun commented Apr 12, 2023

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

Dlink0.7.2下的UDF 目前还在孵化阶段，请谨慎使用；
step1: 当我进行UDF测试的时候，不小心COPY相同的代码位于不同的UDF中
image
step2: 当我进行Dlink重启的时候，提示重复的函数，不能启动
image

What you expected to happen

目前UDF还在孵化阶段，请谨慎使用；
应该在UDF定义的时候，将函数名和作业名字关联，确保函数名和作业名一样，是唯一的
image

How to reproduce

只需要定义两个UDF，名字不同，但是内容是一样的即可

Anything else

No response

Version

0.7.2

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct
@ixiekun ixiekun added Bug Something isn't working Waiting for reply Waiting for reply labels Apr 12, 2023
@ixiekun ixiekun changed the title [Bug] [dlink-admin] UDF定义相同包下的相同类名，导致Dlink无法重启的问题 [Bug] [dlink-admin] UDF重复，导致Dlink无法重启的问题 Duplicate key com.dlink.function.data.model.UDF Apr 12, 2023
@aiwenmo aiwenmo removed the Waiting for reply Waiting for reply label Apr 12, 2023
@gaoyan1998
Copy link
Contributor

1.0 fixed

@gaoyan1998 gaoyan1998 added Fixed the bug has fixed and removed Bug Something isn't working labels Dec 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Fixed the bug has fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@aiwenmo @gaoyan1998 @ixiekun