This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 20, 2018. It is now read-only.
migrating to scala 2.10 #359
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tgalery
force-pushed
the
feature/scala-2.10
branch
from
18006c6
to
0554b97
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a rip off from @dirkweissenborn work on this PR #306, but I think that migrating to scala 2.10 might be a good call, if we have success in our 2 gsoc projects this year. It seems to work for me, although Intellij complains that there are a couple of abstract classes that need to implement
toArray. Note that I wast to merge this to development, which means that master will remain rock solid. Thoughts are appreciated.