Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

step-69: Remove boundary c_ij fix #10926

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 23, 2020
Merged

Conversation

tamiko
Copy link
Member

@tamiko tamiko commented Sep 16, 2020

We compute the boundary normal by averaging the normal over the
quadrature points weighted with the shape function. It turns out that
this is sufficient to preserve mass and total energy. No change of the
c_ij's are needed.

We compute the boundary normal by averaging the normal over the
quadrature points weighted with the shape function. It turns out that
this is sufficient to preserve mass and total energy. No change of the
c_ij's are needed.
@tamiko
Copy link
Member Author

tamiko commented Sep 16, 2020

@itomasSNL @kronbichler ping

@tamiko
Copy link
Member Author

tamiko commented Sep 16, 2020

All, I would like to get a review by @itomasSNL on this one 😅

@drwells drwells changed the title step-59: Remove boundary c_ij fix step-69: Remove boundary c_ij fix Sep 17, 2020
@tamiko
Copy link
Member Author

tamiko commented Sep 22, 2020

/rebuild

@tamiko
Copy link
Member Author

tamiko commented Sep 22, 2020

Let's merge this as is - @itomasSNL promised to follow up with some documentation updates in a separate pull request :-)

@nachosaurus
Copy link
Contributor

@kronbichler @tamiko Now the documentation and the source code are consistent.

@tamiko tamiko removed the WIP ⚠️ label Sep 23, 2020
@kronbichler kronbichler merged commit 2aaa42d into dealii:master Sep 23, 2020
@tamiko tamiko deleted the fix-step-69 branch January 4, 2022 12:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants