Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix a rendering issue with doxygen 1.9.3 #13294

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2022
Merged

fix a rendering issue with doxygen 1.9.3 #13294

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ advance the solution. This leaves very little reason to use vector-valued
finite element spaces both in theory and/or practice.

We will use the usual Lagrange finite elements: let $\{\mathbf{x}_i\}_{i \in
\mathcal{V}}$ denote the set of all support points (see @ref GlossSupport "this
glossary entry"), where $\mathbf{x}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$. Then each index $i \in
\mathcal{V}}$ denote the set of all support points (see @ref GlossSupport "this glossary entry"),
where $\mathbf{x}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$. Then each index $i \in
\mathcal{V}$ uniquely identifies a support point $\mathbf{x}_i$, as well as a
scalar-valued shape function $\phi_i$. With this notation at hand we can define
the (explicit time stepping) scheme as:
Expand Down