Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Simplify logic in RepartitioningPolicyTools::FirstChildPolicy #13479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 3, 2022
Merged

Simplify logic in RepartitioningPolicyTools::FirstChildPolicy #13479

merged 1 commit into from Mar 3, 2022

Conversation

peterrum
Copy link
Member

@peterrum peterrum commented Mar 2, 2022

No description provided.

bangerth
bangerth approved these changes Mar 3, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@bangerth bangerth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, very nice! This also removes an implicit assumption about how exactly our data structures are laid out.

@bangerth
Copy link
Member

bangerth commented Mar 3, 2022

/rebuild

@peterrum
Copy link
Member Author

peterrum commented Mar 3, 2022

Yes, very nice! This also removes an implicit assumption about how exactly our data structures are laid out.

@bangerth I don't even know why I did not implement it like this in the first place. It is called first-child policy, i.e., child(0)...

@bangerth
Copy link
Member

bangerth commented Mar 3, 2022 via email

@kronbichler kronbichler merged commit 6c06583 into dealii:master Mar 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bangerth bangerth bangerth approved these changes

@kronbichler kronbichler kronbichler approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Parallel distributed ready to test Reviewed and ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@peterrum @bangerth @kronbichler