Add AffineConstraints::is_closed() #13505
Conversation
| @@ -770,6 +770,22 @@ class AffineConstraints : public Subscriptor | |||
| void | |||
| close(); | |||
|
|
|||
| /** | |||
| * Check if the function is_closed() was called or there are no | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| * Check if the function is_closed() was called or there are no | |
| * Check if the function close() was called or there are no |
| is_closed() const; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Check if the function is_closed() was called or there are no |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| * Check if the function is_closed() was called or there are no | |
| * Check if the function close() was called or there are no |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right, this does not make any sense ;)
| * AffineConstraints was created for the DG case. | ||
| */ | ||
| bool | ||
| is_closed(const MPI_Comm &comm) const; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you think it would make sense to select a more descriptive name here?
| is_closed(const MPI_Comm &comm) const; | |
| is_closed_on_all_processes(const MPI_Comm &comm) const; |
(Given that the AffineConstraints class does not have the notion of the parallel distribution built-in.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To be consistent would be is_closed_in_parallel (similar to is_consistent_in_parallel). The reason why I opted against this is that normally one calls or not close() on all processes (the only reason for having the reduction inisde to be able to decide if the index set is empty - since the constructor sets sorted automatically to false). If you think it is more clear, I can rename the function to is_closed_in_parallel.
|
/rebuild |
No description provided.