Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing changelog entry about the improvement to step-68 #15744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 15, 2023

Conversation

blaisb
Copy link
Member

@blaisb blaisb commented Jul 14, 2023

As requested by @bangerth , this adds a changelog entry to the improvement made to step-68 :)
Sorry about that.

Copy link
Member

@peterrum peterrum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In future, I don't think we need to create change-log entries like these.

@blaisb
Copy link
Member Author

blaisb commented Jul 14, 2023

In future, I don't think we need to create change-log entries like these.

No worries. Both are fine with me. It is just that it was asked of me, hence me making it :).

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
Improvement: Step-68 now uses the FEPointEvaluation to calculate the particle velocity from the velocity solution instead of manually interpolating at the particle location.
<br>
(Bruno Blais, 2023/07/0)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want to set the right date?

Suggested change
(Bruno Blais, 2023/07/0)
(Bruno Blais, 2023/07/07)

Also, please break the first line at 80 characters.

@bangerth
Copy link
Member

I disagree that we don't need these entries. They are useful to show our users what all we have done, and we also use them to write the release papers and release announcements.

@tamiko tamiko merged commit e082687 into dealii:master Jul 15, 2023
11 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants