Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize on 'const X' instead of 'X const'. #15908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bangerth
Copy link
Member

As mentioned in #15903. I think this catches a good share of the non-whitespace changes in #15903. There are a few of the form X const where X is a template type that I cannot easily catch with a regex -- but this is better than nothing I figure.

@tamiko tamiko merged commit 0206609 into dealii:master Aug 22, 2023
12 of 15 checks passed
@bangerth bangerth deleted the const branch August 22, 2023 03:18
@bangerth
Copy link
Member Author

Wait, you didn't even wait for the CI checks? :-)

@tamiko
Copy link
Member

tamiko commented Aug 22, 2023

@bangerth YOLO. I waited for indent to pass.

Let's wait for #15909 to pass the testsuite.

@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ namespace FETools
// sufficiently large so that there
// are more than about 5000
// operations in the inner loop
// (which is basically const * n^2
// (which is const basically * n^2
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:-D (will fix in #15909)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, oops! :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants