Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use check_solver_within_range in PETSc(serial) tests #4724

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2017

Conversation

masterleinad
Copy link
Member

Part of #4715. Relates #4704.

@tjhei
Copy link
Member

tjhei commented Aug 8, 2017

/run-tests

@drwells
Copy link
Member

drwells commented Aug 8, 2017

I would still prefer that we are a bit more conservative and add a new macro that reproduces the current test output.

@tamiko
Copy link
Member

tamiko commented Aug 8, 2017

@drwells I disagree. The idea is to make the output more stable with respect to compiler optimizations.
Printing initial and final residuals and the iteration number is not a great idea.

@masterleinad
Copy link
Member Author

I'll need to fix up this a bit.

@masterleinad
Copy link
Member Author

Done.

@drwells drwells merged commit dded844 into dealii:master Aug 9, 2017
@masterleinad masterleinad deleted the usecheck_solver_petsc branch October 16, 2017 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants