-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 398
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Participatory texts - review workflow document upload #4770
Comments
Hi @tramuntanal, indeed this is the approved design, but the problem is the behavior of the component in case there is an error with the file upload, and IMHO that should be taken into account when programming it.
Thanks, also I think this is not so different from the above, considering that there is also no design for editing the title and description. By the way, where is the description shown? In the frontend it is not visible. |
Probably I could have raised a hand, my fault. But why it is so clear that it had to be taken into account when programming but not when designing it or when approving it? Anyway we'll enhance this feature as requested because it is not usable this way. Can you provide your expected workflow and designs please? (maybe a "reset current text" checkbox in the form? Regarding the description it is not rendered anywhere. I added it just for admin's self organization but I can remove it if it has no sense. |
Hi @decidim/product we'll add
If the admin does not like the uploaded participaory text she will have to click RESET ALL (the new button), confirm (alert in the button), and then click the current IMPORT DOCUMENT again.
|
Hi @tramuntanal sounds good! |
@decidim/product This Issue can be closed as all features are now implemented. |
Describe the bug
What went wrong?
This means that in order to repeat the operation you have to create a new component of proposals, not being able to delete the first one. And you can end up having 'n' proposal components depending on the errors you make when uploading the file.
What did you expect to happen?
Additional context
https://meta.decidim.org/processes/bug-report/f/210/proposals/13772
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: